I say what I say knowing full well that I may be attacked for my first ever formalized and publicly expressed television show review. But, knowing that as well as the fact that there are already many voices in LOST fandom, I felt compelled to say something of last week’s episode, ‘Everybody Loves Hugo’, which centers on Hurley, or Hugo Reyes (as is obvious from its title). As this is experimental, I kind of just chose five things that are important to me and went from there.

VALUE

Okay, first off, this episode was very entertaining and we did get some answers. The whispers are dead people stuck on the island? Not sure how this works with Ben’s comment to Rousseau last season (“When you hear whispers, run the other way!” – not verbatim), but it’s nice to know the facts all the same. This particular fact also ups the re-watch value of many previous episodes in which dead people have appeared and in which whispers were heard. And, for me personally, seeing Desmond work some magic brought joy to my soul. Not to mention the fact that, overall, this episode was about a man doing his best to do what’s right.

STORY

Who doesn’t like a real advancement of the plot? Having the episode end with both Jack seeing Locke on the island for the first time (as his new self, of course) and Desmond pulling a hit-and-run on Locke off-island made for a gripping and unsettling ending: just the thing I like about LOST. For the first time this season, too, we got to see Hurley–the heart of the show and the most likely person to make good decisions–in action as a leader. While Desmond getting tossed down the well was predictable from the beginning of the scene, the story of this episode overall seemed to be the watershed we needed after some answers came to us in Desmond’s ‘Happily Ever After’.

WRITING

However, I had a real problem with the writing. Eddy Kitsis and Adam Horowitz did a fantastic job with ‘Dr. Linus’ many weeks ago, but this one had a lot of dead conversation and some strange, unLOST-like moments. Like, why did Hurley have to walk off into the bushes and have this blatantly revelatory little exchange with Michael of “Oh, these are the what the whispers are”? And it might have been better if the scenes with Libby weren’t so…awkward. Yeah, she might be a ‘loony,’ but I don’t think she was given very good lines. “Do you believe that two people can be soul mates?” and “Then I’m not crazy!” needed a bit more exposition or should have been expressed a different way. The order of events throughout the episode was great, but the dialogue needed some work.

CHARACTERS

That said, the character development was pretty good. Desmond continues the fulfillment of his self-proclaimed purpose, Hurley steps up to the plate, and Jack connects with Hurley’s leadership in an important way. On the down side, I was disappointed in the randomly strange decision of Richard, Ben, and Miles to part ways with the rest of the group. As many have already pointed out, they left the candidates!! I don’t know about you, but that seems like a poor decision to me. Even then, I respect that different characters react different ways. The one that made the least sense to me was Ben’s very fast choice of Richard over Hurley. I know Ben’s been with Richard almost his entire life, but Ben said himself that Richard doesn’t know anything. And, as everybody can see, Richard has changed recently and he’s more likely to say things like “We’re all dead!!” He doesn’t seem like that great of a leader.

ACTING

I think it’s mostly due to the writing, but I was not impressed with Jorge Garcia’s acting in the beach scene when he realized the alternate timeline. It seemed like this should have been a more pivotal moment for him, but he kind of had this weird eyebrow furrowing thing that didn’t speak ‘surprise’ or ‘amazement.’ More so, it said ‘curious,’ which seemed out of place. On the flip side, I thoroughly enjoyed Harold Perrineau’s reprise of Michael. He did a superb job with what few lines he had, especially in his apology to Libby via Hurley  in the on-island sequence.

OVERALL

Well, I love LOST, so I really shouldn’t complain. Compared with other Season 6 episodes, though, this one didn’t measure up. It had some great story development, but the writing and acting mainly bothered me. But would I watch it again? Yes!

11/15, B

Why should ye be stricken anymore

With wound and bruise and putrefying sore?

Close them up and mollify with oil.

Close them up and mollify with oil.

Into your ill this ointment will I pour.

You land is bare and cities burned with fire.

Desolation made your lodge a mire.

Wash you, make you clean, and evil cease.

Wash you, make you clean, and evil cease.

Learn, do well, relieve oppression’s ire.

I will take thy tin and purge thy dross.

Zion, nigh redeemed, shall e’er the loss

Smite and all transgression full consume,

Smite and all transgression full consume,

Burning with the spark the quench of frost.

Come now, let’s together make aright,

Refusing darkness, love embracing light.

Though your sins be scarlet, crimson red,

Though your sins be scarlet, crimson red,

They shall be as wool and snow of white.

My favorite scripture for a long time has been Isaiah 1:18. Its message communicates the blessing every person wants at some point in his life—the blessing of total redemption from sin and guilt. This message and the eloquence of “Oh Say, What Is Truth?” prompted me to go ahead and finally give this a try. I hope that one day this will be set to music as a choral piece.

I wrote this on Sunday, November 29. I think I did an okay job of paying attention during sacrament meeting, but I know I missed a lot of things because I was writing. I flipped through Isaiah 1, wrote a few words or lines, listened to the speaker, and then went back to Isaiah 1, the process repeating itself over and over again. When the meeting concluded, I finished the poem.

For reference, the following verses contributed to the following stanzas:

1^st Stanza: 5-6

2^nd Stanza: 7-8, 16-17

3^rd Stanza: 25, 27-28, 31

4^th Stanza: 18, 20

I have thought this evening about a passage from Amos 3:7:

Surely the Lord God will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets.

I have heard mainly two interpretations of this verse. One of them is that the Lord will always speak through a prophet if He is going to do anything among us. That is what I believe Amos was saying.

God does speak through His prophets. And He has only left His children without a prophet during times of great wickedness, when the majority of the people apostatize from the right way and reject Him. Peter reminded us, in Acts 10:43:

To him [Christ] give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins.

How grateful I am to live in a day when there are prophets on the earth. Many people don’t believe there is a prophet through whom the Lord speaks today, but I do. His name is Thomas S. Monson.

President Monson

At a conference two months ago, he said:

I bear my testimony to you that this work is true, that our Savior lives, and that He guides and directs His Church here upon the earth. I leave with you my witness and my testimony that God our Eternal Father lives and loves us. He is indeed our Father, and He is personal and real.

Smiling a normal smile, while eyeing with three eyes

Your house interior and property, of which eyeing you take note,

And say, “I think you’ve come for something else, O antelope–

Something more than my first aid, of which I’ll happily give,

If you will explain how in the world it’s in this world you live.”

“It’s true, I’m from another world,” the antelope does say,

“My name is Fred and I did hear you’d help me out today.

You see, my home has been invaded by aliens galore.

My people are all but extinct, and I have to your door

Come to ask assistance of you and your family,

Assistance to retaliate and set my people free.”

Pondering on this request, you gather all he said,

View This Poll

Read Part 1.

What do you think?

View This Poll

Friend: We should do something totally different from the rest of the class.

Me: No, guys, I don’t think that’s a good idea.

Friend: Why? We should do something she won’t expect.

Me: Like what?

Friend: Like…the king should be Mexican. [etc.]

Me: I don’t know, guys. I think we should play it safe.

Fortunately we didn’t play it safe. Our king was Mexican, we altered all the wording in the story, and our adaptation became a comedy. And you know what? Our teacher loved it. She loved that we thought outside the box and did something daring. And she thought it was hilarious.

I read in my journal from my junior year last night and found this excerpt:

I wrote a compare and contrast essay in English class this past week sometime. I couldn’t decide what to write about, so I asked McKay. He threw out some ideas, but none were very good until he suggested I compare my feet to Mr. Menendian’s feet. So, I did. I explained in the essay how my feet were extremely useful to me and how Mr. Menendian’s feet were of no use.

I remember getting a good grade on that essay. It’s been good to learn and relearn this important lesson throughout my life. I’ve found that being the unexpected has really paid off.

In other words, why do people choose to leave the Church or destroy their marriages or any number of things? I thought about it for a while after she asked me, and I’ve thought about it several times since then. My response the first time was something like, “I suppose people break their covenants because their priorities start to shift over time and they end up valuing some sin more than the commitments they’ve made.”

I read this morning from Elder Richard G. Scott’s recent conference address, and Karen’s question came to my mind again. He said:

An individual with foundation standards and an enduring commitment to obey them is not easily led astray. Someone who is increasingly repulsed by grievous sin and who exercises self-restraint outside human influence has character.

I feel like foundation and enduring are two words that hit the target. When we get out of practice and let our daily scripture study, daily prayer, Family Home Evening, church attendance, temple attendance, and other important things slip out of our lives, we replace them with other things. It’s natural. When you stop doing one thing, the hours in the day don’t change, but you do! Fortunately, Elder Scott spoke of ‘mending’ our covenants, so to speak:

A feeling of remorse after a mistake is a fertile soil wherein repentance can flower.

What do you think of Karen’s question?

Fresno Temple

I know people of other faiths who believe they will be with their spouses after death. Where does this doctrine come from? My understanding is that it is not taught in their churches. But it is a true doctrine, under the proper circumstances:

D&C 132:19 . . . I say unto you, if a man marry a wife by my word, which is my law, and by the new and everlasting covenant, and it is sealed unto them by the Holy Spirit of promise, by him who is anointed, unto whom I have appointed this power and the keys of this priesthood . . . then shall it be written in the Lamb’s Book of Life . . . and shall be of full force when they are out of the world . . . .

It is a natural thing to want to be with each other after death, but that’s not what most civil ceremonies will tell you is possible. “Till death do you part,” is the phrase we hear, but what do we feel? In a civil ceremony, the blessing of being married is conditional upon staying alive.

Done without priesthood authority, however, the ‘conditions’ are different:

D&C 132:15 . . . [I]f a man marry him a wife in the world, and he marry her not by me nor by my word, . . . their covenant and marriage are not of force when they are dead, and when they are out of the world . . . .

I feel so grateful that the priesthood has been restored in our day through the prophet Joseph Smith. I can be with Karen for time and eternity if I live righteously, and the same can be said of others, but only through the sealing power. This is something to be grateful for–that there is order in God’s kingdom and that He loves us enough to allow us to live as families beyond death. It is this same power that Peter received from the Savior roughly 2000 years ago:

Matthew 16:19 And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.

Forever

Top: Elders Parkhurst, Jackson, Schwantes, Plunkett, and Monterroso / Bottom: Elders Dale, Christensen, Fernelius, and Smith, with me on the end

I teach missionaries five days a week. They stay for three weeks at a time and then go to various parts of the world. Since I recently moved classrooms, I taught these missionaries for two days, but we formed a good bond.

Top: Me and Elders Dorey, Sneary, and Petersen / Bottom: Sister Power, Elder Bryan, Sisters Duffy and Young, and Elder Tikalsky

But this group is the one I taught before moving classrooms. They leave soon. And this was Argyle day. (Missionaries make their own special holidays sometimes.)

A Break

I teach missionaries, and sometimes we take breaks to get a drink of water and stuff.

My Shoes

And this is me playing with the camera in that very hallway.

I love my job.

Supplication yields what mercy

God our Father would bestow.

Now let us exalt Him ever

With our thanks from here below.

 

CHORUS

Praise the Lord, O praise the Lord, O

Praise the Lord our God!

 

Can we be at all ungrateful

When abundance is our lot?

Rather than a muttered murmur,

Let’s express a thankful thought.

 

CHORUS

 

Will we find a greater giver

If in man we put our trust?

No, for God gives man His pow’r, so

Praise the Lord our God we must!

 

CHORUS